<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Helpfulinvesting.com &#187; fha</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.helpfulinvesting.com/tag/fha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.helpfulinvesting.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:41:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FHA Policy Changes Being Considered</title>
		<link>http://www.helpfulinvesting.com/fha-policy-changes-being-considered-1417/</link>
		<comments>http://www.helpfulinvesting.com/fha-policy-changes-being-considered-1417/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash reserves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt-to-income ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of housing and urban development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal housing administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan-to-value ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qualify]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helpfulinvesting.com/?p=1417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some big buzz going around is about the new policy changes that the FHA is considering.  We get some great emails from Chris McLaughlin who sends out some of the most informative emails I get about the latest changes in the real estate world. I highly suggest signing up for his email newsletter.  Below is an update he sent out yesterday.
<p style="text-align: left;"></p>
The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) is considering three policy changes to boost its capital reserves. Under<p>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Some big buzz going around is about the new policy changes that the FHA is considering.  We get some great emails from Chris McLaughlin who sends out some of the most informative emails I get about the latest changes in the real estate world. I highly suggest signing up for his email newsletter.  Below is an update he sent out yesterday.
<p style="text-align: left;"></p>
The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) is considering three policy changes to boost its capital reserves. Under the changes, new borrowers seeking FHA-insured loans will need a minimum FICO score of 580 to qualify for FHA&#8217;s 3.5% downpayment program. New borrowers with credit scores between 500 and 580 will be required to provide a 10% downpayment, and borrowers with credit scores below 500 will no longer qualify. The US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published a notice today seeking public comment on the measures, which are designed to reduce financial risk and preserve affordable mortgage finance. HUD will accept public comment for the next 30 days on the proposed changes.  &#8221;These are the latest in a series of changes to allow the FHA to manage its risk better while continuing to support the nation&#8217;s housing recovery,&#8221; said FHA commissioner David Stevens in a press release.
<p style="text-align: left;"></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Specifically, the FHA is proposing to update the combination of credit and downpayment requirements for new borrowers, reduce seller concessions from 6% to 3% and tighten underwriting standards for manually-underwritten loans.  The changes also seek to reduce the share of the home sales price that sellers are allowed to contribute at the closing table to offset the buyers&#8217; costs. The current share of 6% &#8220;exposes the FHA to excess risk by potentially driving up the cost of the home beyond its appraised value,&#8221; the FHA said in a statement today. The proposed change would reduce seller concessions to 3%, which the FHA said would bring it into conformity with industry standards.  The proposed FHA policy updates also require lenders, during the underwriting process, to consider compensating factors that are &#8220;the best predictive indicators of loan performance&#8221; — credit history, loan-to-value ratio, debt-to-income ratio and cash reserves.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Chris McLaughlin
**************</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Copyright Loss Mitigation Institute LLC 2010.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">All Rights Reserved.
<a href="http://www.shortsalesriches.com/" target="_blank"></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.shortsalesriches.com/" target="_blank">http://www.shortsalesriches.com</a></p><div style='clear:both'></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.helpfulinvesting.com/fha-policy-changes-being-considered-1417/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Don&#8217;t Care How Good of a Customer You Have Been&#8230; Jump Through This Hoop!</title>
		<link>http://www.helpfulinvesting.com/i-dont-care-how-good-of-a-customer-you-have-been-jump-through-this-hoop-932/</link>
		<comments>http://www.helpfulinvesting.com/i-dont-care-how-good-of-a-customer-you-have-been-jump-through-this-hoop-932/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 02:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Housing Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helpfulinvesting.com/?p=932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>RISMEDIA, May 1, 2010—(MCT)—As a consumer with good credit and a 10-year history of paying his mortgage on time, Ed McLaughlin expected that his record would put him in good stead with his bank.</p> <p>But when he approached his lender, Charlotte, N.C.-based Bank of America, about refinancing his existing mortgage or qualifying for a new  loan, McLaughlin felt like a brand-new customer just off the street. <span id="more-46177"></span></p> <p>“They said new banking laws required that I jump through all the&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RISMEDIA, May 1, 2010—(MCT)—As a consumer with good credit and a 10-year history of paying his mortgage on time, Ed McLaughlin expected that his record would put him in good stead with his bank.</p> <p>But when he approached his lender, Charlotte, N.C.-based Bank of America, about refinancing his existing mortgage or qualifying for a new  loan, McLaughlin felt like a brand-new customer just off the street. <span id="more-46177"></span></p> <p>“They said new banking laws required that I jump through all the hoops, which I thought was a little odd because my record with Bank of America had been good,” said McLaughlin. “All the new paperwork, all the  new guidelines they were now required to administer. All that was going  to complicate it.”</p> <p>McLaughlin wasn’t being singled out—he was simply finding out firsthand how the residential mortgage industry has changed since the housing meltdown. After a period when too many lenders focused just on getting people into homes—and not on whether they could afford them—the pendulum has swung back in the other direction.</p> <p>The number of mortgage products offered to consumers has shrunk, while the amount of income documentation required of borrowers has increased.</p> <p>“It’s going back to how things were done 10 years ago,” said Jim Bennison, a senior vice president with Raleigh-based Genworth Mortgage Insurance.</p> <p>The new landscape can be particularly jarring for borrowers used to the recent go-go years, when some lenders required little proof of a borrower’s income and liabilities and enticed them with a range of exotic loans with variable interest rates.</p> <p>The underwriting standards for borrowers are now being dictated almost entirely by three government entities that have come to dominate the mortgage market: the Federal Housing Administration, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.</p> <p>A bank today is highly unlikely to issue a mortgage that won’t be guaranteed by one of these three. A few years ago, a buyer might have found the house of her dreams and then worried about how to finance it. Now, getting pre-qualified for a loan should be one of the first steps.</p> <p>“People need to call a mortgage professional earlier in the process than they think,” said Todd Barbour, vice president of Meridian Residential, a mortgage company in Cary, NC. “The very moment you think,  ‘I might want to buy a house,’ someone like me should be the next phone  call.” Given how severe the housing downturn has been, Barbour said, many people assume they won’t be able to get a loan. That’s a mistake, he said, because there are good loans available for qualified buyers and  interest rates are at historic lows.</p> <p>One of Barbour’s clients recently purchased a home for $285,000 in Wake Forest, NC. The couple got a 30-year mortgage with an interest rate  of less than 5%. “It went crazy smooth for us,” Lauri Moore said. “It was literally a miracle how smooth it went.” The Moores had great credit  and made a 20% down payment, something not all buyers are in a position  to do.</p> <p>One option that has become attractive, particularly for first-time home buyers, is FHA loans, which require borrowers to put down just 3.5%  if they have a credit score of 580 or above. By comparison, to qualify for a low-rate conventional mortgage, a buyer will need a credit score of about 740. The number of loans being insured by FHA has exploded in the past three years as Wall Street stopped buying up mortgage-backed securities.</p> <p>FHA loans don’t require a borrower to have private mortgage insurance, but anyone else who can’t put 20% down is typically required to get PMI. For a borrower such as the Moores, PMI would have come to about $200 a month, Lauri Moore said. PMI providers such as Genworth offer borrowers additional benefits such as assistance in the event of unemployment and help in reworking mortgages to help families avoid foreclosure.</p> <p>During the housing boom, many borrowers avoided having to buy mortgage insurance by getting a so-called piggyback loan, which is a second mortgage taken out at the same time as a first mortgage. Today, fewer banks are offering customers piggyback loans, which typically have  a higher interest rate than the first mortgage.</p> <p>Although borrowers should pay close attention to their credit score, that number is just one of several indicators a lender will use in evaluating a borrower. Lenders today want documentation of a borrower’s income for at least the last two years plus information about total debt, which includes any assessments, credit card balances and auto loans as well as how much cash is available for a down payment.</p> <p>“People have to be organized,” said John Cross, Bank of America’s regional sales executive for North Carolina. “That means keeping copies of your tax records, having access to your bank statements, your W-2s. A  little bit more fiscal responsibility has probably been put on the borrower.”</p> <p>Both first-time home buyers and repeat buyers should expect lenders to take into account what their loan-to-income ratio is.</p> <p>Mark Goldhaber, a Genworth senior vice president, said from 2002 to 2006 it was not unusual to see homeowners whose total debts, including their mortgage payment, took up 55% or more of their income. Today, banks want total debt to be in the 40-45% range, which is in line with historical lending standards.</p> <p>“A consumer who is educated and informed is really the best underwriter of all,” Goldhaber said. “If you know what you can afford, then you’re not going to get yourself into too much house.”</p> <p>(c) 2010, The News &amp; Observer (Raleigh, N.C.).</p> <p>Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.</p> <p>RISMedia welcomes your questions and comments. Send your e-mail to: <a href="mailto:%20realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com">realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com</a>.</p><div style='clear:both'></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.helpfulinvesting.com/i-dont-care-how-good-of-a-customer-you-have-been-jump-through-this-hoop-932/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fraud FINALLY on the Decline!</title>
		<link>http://www.helpfulinvesting.com/fraud-finally-on-the-decline-879/</link>
		<comments>http://www.helpfulinvesting.com/fraud-finally-on-the-decline-879/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subprime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helpfulinvesting.com/?p=879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First American CoreLogic's index of home loan fraud shows that the rate tied to non-subprime loans has declined to 84 from a 2007 peak of about 112. Still, the firm says a quarter of foreclosures reflect "some evidence of fraud" in the mortgage application.

First American estimates that 0.55 percent of mortgages made in 2009 were fraudulent and that the fraud rate for loans insured by the FHA is 1.22 percent. Fraudulent mortgages totaled $14 billion last year; and fraud rates in hot spots like Orlando and Miami, Fla., Atlanta, and Detroit are three to four times the national average.

Source: The Wall Street Journal, James Hagerty (03/15/10)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<font size="2" face="Arial">First American CoreLogic&#8217;s index of home loan fraud shows that the rate tied to non-subprime loans has declined to 84 from a 2007 peak of about 112. Still, the firm says a quarter of foreclosures reflect &quot;some evidence of fraud&quot; in the mortgage application. </font><br /> <br /><font size="2" face="Arial">First American estimates that 0.55 percent of mortgages made in 2009 were fraudulent and that the fraud rate for loans insured by the FHA is 1.22 percent. Fraudulent mortgages totaled $14 billion last year; and fraud rates in hot spots like Orlando and <yoono-highlight onmouseout="___yoonoLink.onYoonoOut(this)" onmouseover="___yoonoLink.onYoonoOver(event,this)" onclick="___yoonoLink.onYoonoClick(this)" keywords="Miami" class="yoono-link-hover yoono-link-active-link">Miami</yoono-highlight>,  Fla., Atlanta, and <yoono-highlight onmouseout="___yoonoLink.onYoonoOut(this)" onmouseover="___yoonoLink.onYoonoOver(event,this)" onclick="___yoonoLink.onYoonoClick(this)" keywords="Detroit" class="yoono-link-hover yoono-link-active-link">Detroit</yoono-highlight>  are three to four times the national average. </font><br /> <br /><em><font size="2" face="Arial">Source: The <yoono-highlight onmouseout="___yoonoLink.onYoonoOut(this)" onmouseover="___yoonoLink.onYoonoOver(event,this)" onclick="___yoonoLink.onYoonoClick(this)" keywords="Wall Street Journal" class="yoono-link-hover yoono-link-active-link">Wall Street Journal</yoono-highlight>,  James Hagerty (03/15/10)</font></em><br /><div style='clear:both'></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.helpfulinvesting.com/fraud-finally-on-the-decline-879/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

